Tuesday, January 8, 2008

A New Day?


Palmetto Sunrise
Originally uploaded by paynehollow
Obama seems to have a groove on. Here, from his website, is our probable next president on…

Iraq:

Bring Our Troops Home: Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.

Diplomacy:

The United States is trapped by the Bush-Cheney approach to diplomacy that refuses to talk to leaders we don't like. Not talking doesn't make us look tough – it makes us look arrogant, it denies us opportunities to make progress, and it makes it harder for America to rally international support for our leadership.

Fight Global Poverty:

Obama will embrace the Millennium Development Goal of cutting extreme poverty around the world in half by 2015, and he will double our foreign assistance to $50 billion to achieve that goal. He will help the world's weakest states to build healthy and educated communities, reduce poverty, develop markets, and generate wealth.

Oil dependence:

Obama's plan will reduce oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels per day, by 2030.

Obama will establish a 25 percent federal Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to require that 25 percent of electricity consumed in the U.S. is derived from clean, sustainable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal by 2025.

Set National Building Efficiency Goals: Obama will establish a goal of making all new buildings carbon neutral, or produce zero emissions, by 2030.

Establish a Grant Program for Early Adopters: Obama will create a competitive grant program to award those states and localities that take the first steps to implement new building codes that prioritize energy efficiency.

[What’s missing: Any mention of living within our means, reducing the huge amounts of energy consumed. I’m more concerned about his energy plank than anything else, as I think it will be one of our major issues to deal with in the coming ten-twenty years. – Dan]

Trade:

Fight for Fair Trade: Obama will fight for a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs. He will use trade agreements to spread good labor and environmental standards around the world and stand firm against agreements like the Central American Free Trade Agreement that fail to live up to those important benchmarks. Obama will also pressure the World Trade Organization to enforce trade agreements and stop countries from continuing unfair government subsidies to foreign exporters and nontariff barriers on U.S. exports.

Amend the North American Free Trade Agreement: Obama believes that NAFTA and its potential were oversold to the American people. Obama will work with the leaders of Canada and Mexico to fix NAFTA so that it works for American workers.

[I’d like to know what “fixes” he has in mind. Worrisome. – Dan]

Labor:

Ensure Freedom to Unionize: Obama believes that workers should have the freedom to choose whether to join a union without harassment or intimidation from their employers. Obama cosponsored and is strong advocate for the Employee Free Choice Act, a bipartisan effort to assure that workers can exercise their right to organize.

Work/Family balance:

Encourage States to Adopt Paid Leave: As president, Obama will initiate a strategy to encourage all 50 states to adopt paid-leave systems. Obama will provide a $1.5 billion fund to assist states with start-up costs and to help states offset the costs for employees and employers.

Rural:

Strong Safety Net for Family Farmers: Obama will fight for farm programs that provide family farmers with stability and predictability. Obama will implement a $250,000 payment limitation so that we help family farmers — not large corporate agribusiness.

[Amen! At least to that last part. No more subsidies for ConAgra. – Dan]

Obama's Environmental Protection Agency will strictly regulate pollution from large CAFOs, with fines for those that violate tough standards. Obama also supports meaningful local control.

[A question I’d want to see answered: Who will Obama appoint for cabinets? I say we should have no more of the foxes protecting the hen-house! No more coal company execs as our watchguard for the coal industry. No more oil execs as energy czars. Etc, etc. – Dan]

Encourage Young People to Become Farmers: Obama will establish a new program to identify and train the next generation of farmers. He will also provide tax incentives to make it easier for new farmers to afford their first farm.

Partner with Landowners to Conserve Private Lands: Obama will increase incentives for farmers and private landowners to conduct sustainable agriculture and protect wetlands, grasslands, and forests.

Fiscal responsibility:

Reinstate PAYGO Rules: Obama believes that a critical step in restoring fiscal discipline is enforcing pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) budgeting rules which require new spending commitments or tax changes to be paid for by cuts to other programs or new revenue.

[Makes sense. – Dan]

Reverse Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Obama will protect tax cuts for poor and middle class families, but he will reverse most of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.

Cut Pork Barrel Spending: Obama introduced and passed bipartisan legislation that would require more disclosure and transparency for special-interest earmarks. Obama believes that spending that cannot withstand public scrutiny cannot be justified. Obama will slash earmarks to no greater than year 2001 levels and ensure all spending decisions are open to the public.

Make Government Spending More Accountable and Efficient: Obama will ensure that federal contracts over $25,000 are competitively bid. Obama will also increase the efficiency of government programs through better use of technology, stronger management that demands accountability and by leveraging the government's high-volume purchasing power to get lower prices.

Obama will stop funding wasteful, obsolete federal government programs that make no financial sense. Obama has called for an end to subsidies for oil and gas companies that are enjoying record profits, as well as the elimination of subsidies to the private student loan industry which has repeatedly used unethical business practices. Obama will also tackle wasteful spending in the Medicare program.

======

Not the best of planks (that would be Kucinich, amongst this bunch currently running) but I’ve seen worse. Given the results of the first two primaries/caucuses and the momentum behind Obama (mixed the total paucity of any competition on the Republican side), I rather suspect he may well be our next president.

Read more of his plans at:

barackobama.com

19 comments:

ELAshley said...

Good grief! The only thing left for you to do is to weep all over his feet and dry them with your beard!

Obama, Savior of America!

Dan Trabue said...

Actually, I'm more of a Kooch man, myself. I'm just thinking that it looks like to me that Obama will be our next president.

If I thought Obama was a savior of any sort, then I wouldn't have written several critical notes about his planks.

In fact, I don't usually write, "Not the best of planks... but I’ve seen worse," about "saviors."

Savior? Hardly. I just hope he slows down the harm that's been done in the last few years.

I'm curious, Eric, where in my few comments did you find my endorsement of Obama?

Dan Trabue said...

In fact, looking back, I wrote six comments. Two were critical, one questioning, one rather so-so and two positive (about being fiscally conservative/responsible).

Which of those indicate that I find Obama to be a "savior?" I could withdraw my praise for fiscal responsibility, but then that might offend my more Right-ish friends here.

Edwin Drood said...

Didn't he treaten to bomb Pakistan?

Dan Trabue said...

I had missed that bit of news. Edwin here is referring to Obama's comments in an August debate that suggested we need to take the fight against terrorism into Pakistan - even if Pakistan doesn't want us to invade.

Obama said:

"If we have actionable intelligence on al Qaeda operatives, including bin Laden, and President Musharraf cannot act, then we should," Obama said. "That's just common sense."

Extra proof that these are not radically progressive folks running on the Dem side of things, just hopefully less-dangerous than those on the Republican side.

Dan Trabue said...

Eric? Was that just a drive by sniping and not a meaningful attempt at dialog? Come now, let us reason, brother.

ELAshley said...

I apologize. My private constant heckler had turned my mood sour... and seeing you referencing so much Obama... I leapt to a conclusion without actually reading it all. Some, but not all.

Dan Trabue said...

Thank you, and no problem.

Michael Westmoreland-White, Ph.D. said...

I'm also a Kucinich man, but he's not going to become president. I initially supported Edwards, but after NH, I don't think he can win--just steal enough votes from Obama to throw the nomination to Clinton--the most hawkish and conservative of the Democratic candidates. So, I gave my reasons for endorsing Obama here:

http://kyfriedpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/01/barack-obama-for-us-president.html

I think it will be a close race for the nomination.

Michael Westmoreland-White, Ph.D. said...

I think Frances Kissling gives good reasons for feminists to NOT support Clinton here:
http://kyfriedpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/01/frances-kissling-on-why-shes-still-not.html

brd said...

Thanks for your insightful analysis. Actually, I think that the slate of candidates running both for the Reps and the Dems is more interesting than it has been for lots of years.

I, too, like Kucinich, but if Clinton isn't nominated I would be happy with Obama as a second choice or Edwards. Also, the top Republicans don't strike the level of fear in my heart that is currently generated by 'G Dub.'

John said...

I prefer Thompson, in large part due to his absolutist stand on border control. He also talks about smaller government. Of course, that doesn't mean that he'll do anything, but increasingly fewer Republicans are even giving lip-service to shrinking government. And the Libertarian Party only produces pie-in-the-sky isolationists. So Thompson looks like the best choice from my point of view.

Marty said...

My Repbulican best friend likes Thompson too. But face it, he won't get the nomination. You're in the same boat as those of us who support Kucinich.

Yesterday my son came for a visit. The first words out of his mouth as he walked through the door were: "if you don't vote for Obama, I'll disown you."

I was wondering what he thought of the presidential candidates, but had not yet discussed it with him. Now I know.

Five years in the U.S. Army and two tours in Baghdad have turned him into a lefty. Oh...he makes his momma proud!

Dan Trabue said...

Thanks for the thoughts, all.

John said...

Da Fred! may win South Carolina. We'll see, then. Anyway, I'll vote my conscience, regardless of the possibility of success.

You know what would be really cool? If Romney wins Michigan, Fred South Carolina and Guliani Florida. We could see a brokered convention!

That would be a truly awesome sight.

Dan Trabue said...

You're leaving out Huckabee and THE FRONT-RUNNER - McCain! At this point, I'd suggest that Huckabee has a greater chance of getting more votes than F Thompson. And that is certainly true of McCain.

My guess (and I have no idea, just looking at polls, but who knows!?) that it will be a Huckabee, McCain, Romney race. The polls:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/11/2008.poll/index.html

have it at McCain (34%), Huckabee (21%), Giuliani (18%) and then Romney (14%)as it stands right now.

I'm still expecting some McCain Swiftboating to start happening. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think the Republican powers that be will allow McCain to be the nominee - as much as it's in their power to prevent.

I think the Republican race is still way too close to begin to guess.

John said...

If Huckabee is nominated, he will lose because of his claims that he wants to amend the Constitution to fit "God's law." Haven't we seen the evils of theocracies enough overseas? True, he was really talking about amendments to ban abortions and gay marriages (which I oppose on their merits), but he isn't talking about giving secular or natural law reasons for these--reasons that could persuade not only non-Christians, but Christians who don't see things his way--but about adopting his interpretation of Scripture and then writing it into the Constitution. Play the videos of that speech repeatedly in the Gen. Election and Huckabee's toast.

Maybe I'm in an echo chamber, but the political blogs that I read all loathe Huckabee, and for among the reasons that you list.

He's the very picture of a theocrat, and cannot be trusted with power.

Dan Trabue said...

Yeah, that's what I've seen, too, John. Huckabee seems to be strongly distrusted amongst the more politically-oriented conservative blogs. Although, it seems to be more because they view him as a social liberal, from what I've seen - especially his stance on immigration.

Michael Westmoreland-White said...

Huckabee just played the race card in SC: Defending the Confederate Flag! This guy is far more hard right than the news has yet caught on!

However, Obama may have just blown Nevada--He compared his candidacy to modern presidents that have been real change agents--including Ronald Reagan. (Yes, Reagan changed things--all for the worse.) I don't think Obama was trying to praise Reagan, although he was, as usual trying pull in Indep. and Republican votes and broaden the Dem. tent. But it sounded like praise to the Dem. blogosphere and they've gone nuts over it.

As this race gets tighter, it is also getting nastier.