Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Deported, and Killed


NPR's Ari Shapiro speaks with Sarah Stillman, who wrote in The New Yorker about the database she and students from Columbia University created that documents people who were deported and then killed as a result.

ARI SHAPIRO: Many immigrants from El Salvador are also afraid that if they return to their home country, they could be killed. In the latest issue of The New Yorker, Sarah Stillman investigates when deportation is a death sentence. Stillman runs the Global Migration Project at Columbia University's journalism school. Over many months, she and a team of students created a record of people who had been deported to Mexico and Central America and then killed or harmed. Sarah Stillman, welcome to the program.

SARAH STILLMAN: Thanks so much for having me.

SHAPIRO: You begin this article with a story of a 23-year-old woman named Laura who lived in Texas, had a restraining order against her husband in Mexico and was detained in a routine traffic stop. What happened to her?

STILLMAN: So Laura had actually been living in the U.S. for most of her adult life. She had U.S. citizen children. She was living in Texas. And one night, she was driving home from work when she was just pulled over for allegedly driving between two lanes. And the cop, when he stopped her, found out that she was undocumented. And he made the, at the time, unconventional decision to call Border Patrol to the scene.

And she pled for her life saying, I've got this protective order. I've been getting death threats from my ex-spouse who's back in Mexico who has joined a drug cartel. He really will kill me if I'm sent back. Nonetheless, that very same night, she was coerced into signing immediate removal paperwork and was marched across the bridge.

SHAPIRO: She said something really chilling to the border agent who detained her.


STILLMAN: Yes. Her last words actually to the Border Patrol agent who was sending her back across the bridge were, you know,

"when I'm found dead, it will be on your conscience. "

And indeed, that's exactly what transpired. Her body was found in a vehicle incinerated after she had been strangled...

Read more...

https://www.npr.org/2018/01/09/576858224/how-one-group-is-tracking-violence-experienced-after-deportation

and here is the article written in The New Yorker about this research...

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/01/15/when-deportation-is-a-death-sentence

And I will say it again: 
Crossing an international border 
to seek safety, food or relief from oppression 
SHOULD NOT BE A CRIME
It is IN NO WAY CRIMINAL.  

I repeat and stress:

IT IS IMMORAL TO TREAT PEOPLE SEEKING REFUGE FROM VIOLENCE OR STARVATION AS IF THEY WERE CRIMINALS.

Not having the "right" documentation is, at worst, a misdemeanor and it should NOT be that and should not be treated like a crime.

We need to change our laws and we need to demand that we stop going beyond our laws, as ICE does now and has for too many years (including under the Obama administration). Of course, it is only getting worse under the current administration.

1 comment:

Marshal Art said...

You're not talking about the problem with laws here. Not with these examples. You're dealing with situations in which the laws weren't properly applied. If the women in first article had some sort of protective order, then the cop and border agents should have been holding her until those orders could have been reviewed, with subsequent actions taken accordingly. If this story is representative of that which this group has found in most, then no law will make a difference except...no law...which is clearly what you support and which is clearly absolutely stupid.

At the same time, pretending that any claim of oppression or starvation means automatic welcome is also stupid. We still are left with the fact that strict vetting must be in place. But even with the most efficient people and methods, perfection is...as it is always...impossible and just because some might end up dead does not justify total open borders.

There is NOTHING in our current laws, nor in the policy proposals of the current administration, that intends to leave people to die. This is bullshit rhetoric and another example of leftist lying.

As to that story in your post, I'm willing to bet all of your money that there are details that are purposely left out in order to plead for that which is not in our nation's best interest, simply because low intellect leftists think they are morally superior to those who respect the rule of law.