Wednesday, July 7, 2021

Learn about CRT Through What is Actually Being Said...


So much disinformation is being spread gleefully, wantonly by people who are hating the idea of Critical Race Theory (CRT) being discussed or taught. In article after article from right wing sources, I see people gossiping and slandering CRT as being Marxist, Anti-American and a whole slew of attack words - the same words that were being used by white people against Martin Luther King, Jr 60 years ago.

In article after article, I see these white people/white conservatives criticizing it, dismissing it, even trying to outlaw it! ...and the one common denominator I'm seeing is that they usually aren't citing the actual theory. They just use attack words like "Marxist" in their efforts to Cancel Culture CRT. Ironically. When they do cite the actual words used by CRT promoters, it's always out of context. But generally speaking, they just don't even cite the actual theory.

This is, of course, stupidly wrong and part of the problem that remains from modern Trump conservatism. 

[And I have to tell you that I am loathe to keep citing this miscreant, but he pretty perfectly sums up what has become of conservatism. Truth and facts don't matter. Attacks are good, repeated attacks are better... you repeat the attacks and the lies and name-calling enough times and some people will start believing the disinformation. At least, the useful idiots will. (Trump has gone on record as saying this deviant "positive thinking" strategy is part of what he embraces.) Just to be clear, Trump is not the cause of this cancer on modern conservatism - conservatives have brought it on themselves. But he is the epitome and poster boy for what has become of modern conservatism. /end rant.]

So, in an effort to battle this cancer on good, rational adult thinking, here is what CRT thinkers are actually saying. If you want to disagree with what they're saying, do it based on facts, not gossip and grade school attacks. Not the style of attacks and demonizations that white supremacists used against King and the Civil Rights movement.

++++++++

Principles of the CRT Practice

While recognizing the evolving and malleable nature of CRT, scholar Khiara Bridges outlines a few key tenets of CRT, including:

  • Recognition that race is not biologically real but is socially constructed and socially significant. It recognizes that science (as demonstrated in the Human Genome Project) refutes the idea of biological racial differences. According to scholars Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, race is the product of social thought and is not connected to biological reality.
  • Acknowledgement that racism is a normal feature of society and is embedded within systems and institutions, like the legal system, that replicate racial inequality. This dismisses the idea that racist incidents are aberrations but instead are manifestations of structural and systemic racism.
  • Rejection of popular understandings about racism, such as arguments that confine racism to a few “bad apples.” CRT recognizes that racism is codified in law, embedded in structures, and woven into public policy. CRT rejects claims of meritocracy or “colorblindness.” CRT recognizes that it is the systemic nature of racism that bears primary responsibility for reproducing racial inequality.
  • Recognition of the relevance of people’s everyday lives to scholarship. This includes embracing the lived experiences of people of color, including those preserved through storytelling, and rejecting deficit-informed research that excludes the epistemologies of people of color.

CRT does not define racism in the traditional manner as solely the consequence of discrete irrational bad acts perpetrated by individuals but is usually the unintended (but often foreseeable) consequence of choices. It exposes the ways that racism is often cloaked in terminology regarding “mainstream,” “normal,” or “traditional” values or “neutral” policies, principles, or practices. And, as scholar Tara Yosso asserts, CRT can be an approach used to theorize, examine, and challenge the ways which race and racism implicitly and explicitly impact social structures, practices, and discourses. CRT observes that scholarship that ignores race is not demonstrating “neutrality” but adherence to the existing racial hierarchy...

Foundational questions that underlie CRT and the law include: How does the law construct race?; How has the law protected racism and upheld racial hierarchies?; How does the law reproduce racial inequality?; and How can the law be used to dismantle race, racism, and racial inequality?

...Like any other approach, CRT can be misunderstood and misapplied. It has been distorted and attacked. And it continues to change and evolve. The hope in CRT is in its recognition that the same policies, structures, and scholarship that can function to disenfranchise and oppress so many also holds the potential to emancipate and empower many. It provides a lens through which the civil rights lawyer can imagine a more just nation.

From the ABA...

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/civil-rights-reimagining-policing/a-lesson-on-critical-race-theory/

+++++

"Critical race theory is a practice.
It's an approach to grappling with a history of White supremacy that
rejects the belief that what's in the past is in the past, and that
the laws and systems that grow from that past are detached from it,"

said Kimberlé Crenshaw, a founding critical race theorist and a law professor who teaches at UCLA and Columbia University...

Crenshaw notes that merely acknowledging the nation's history of racism has long been vilified as unpatriotic and anti-American.

"It bears acknowledging that we've been here before: For his non-violent agitation for civil rights, MLK was targeted by the FBI as the most dangerous man in America," she said.

"The civil rights and Black freedom movements were targeted, surveilled and disrupted by the FBI. Black Lives Matter has been framed by some in law enforcement as a terrorist organization. So racial justice work ... has always had an uneasy relationship with the federal government."

https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/01/us/critical-race-theory-explainer-trnd/index.html

+++++

If people want to talk about CRT, I'm fine with talking about it. But we should begin with discussions based on what the advocates of it are actually saying. If you're only citing sources that white supremacists would applaud, you're not doing your part as a responsible moral adult.

Strike a blow to tyranny. Let us reason like adults.

Saturday, July 3, 2021

On This Indepedence Day...

As we move into this Fourth of July weekend, let's remember and be grateful for those who fought so hard to secure and protect our liberties...

The Protesters.

The agitators, the rabble rousers, those who cared enough to fight for justice and lay their lives on the line for the liberty of all of us.

Thanks to the Boston Tea Party vandals who took a chance and even destroyed property in the fight for liberty.

Thanks to the Abolitionists who broke laws to save lives.

Thanks to our Suffragists who reminded us that we don't have freedom until ALL of us have a voice.

Thanks to the Civil Rights heroes, who struggled so hard for so long to finally make sure that everyone could vote and to fight for justice in so many ways against such vicious opposition.

Thanks to the Stonewall rioters and those who've fought so hard for the rights of historically oppressed people.

Thanks to those who've marched to protest unjust wars that cause such rampant death and destruction around the world.

Thanks to those who've struggled to protect our shared planet, our air, our water, our flora and fauna.

Thanks to those who crawled up steps and agitated for the rights of those with disabilities.

Thanks to BLM and others who continue the fight for the rights of all and to stand against the very real problem of systemic racism.

Thanks to the teachers, the historians, the organizers, the planners, those who learn about and lead us in Non-Violent Civil Disobedience, the allies, the leaders, the followers, the letter writers, the ones who work to improve policies.

Thanks to the creative types and the wonks. The poets, the artists, the singers, the writers, the policy writers, the program writers... We needed you to remind us that we SHALL overcome someday.

Thanks to those who show up.

Thanks to the weirdos and the cranks, the outsiders and those just fighting to get by.

Thanks to Jesus, who led one of the first acts of Civil Disobedience, when he destroyed property and chased the oppressive money changers out of the temple.

Thanks to all who've fought for justice and liberty in one way or another over the millennia. Thanks for making the US, and the world, a better place.

Thursday, July 1, 2021

My Self


 My Self
does not end
at my skin
I take in
the World all around
and I
am taken in

And when
a wall is built
my friend
a barrier to block
and cage
I'll tear down
that wall
in righteous rage
I'll shout
I'll fight
I will delight
in tearing out
that page

from that accursed accounting book
that inventory of ruined slaves

for I am free
oh, yes, you see
I will never be contained

For
My Self
does not end
at my skin
I take in
the World all around
and I
am taken in.

Friday, June 18, 2021

Great Day of Jubilee


Sometimes I'm all alone but Jubilee
Sometimes I'm all alone but Jubilee
Sometimes I'm all alone, my heart done turned to stone
But a great great day of Jubilee

There's a great great Day of Jubilee
A great great Day of Jubilee
A great great Day hard times they can not stay
A great great Day of Jubilee

The time is nigh at hand for Jubilee
The time is nigh at hand for Jubilee
The time is nigh at hand, Good News across the land
A great great Day of Jubilee

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Live With It


 If I were an oak leaf
which, once, sat atop a tower unbending
and I found myself resting
on a soft bed of moss
in a darkening forest... 

I could live with that

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

In Praise of Honest and Decent Conservatives

Even though I disagree with Liz Cheney on most policy opinions, she is right on here. Speak that Truth to Power, Representative Cheney!

"Today we face a threat America has never seen before. A former president, who provoked a violent attack on this capital in an effort to steal the election, has resumed his aggressive effort to convince Americans that the election was stolen from him.

He risks inciting further violence.
Millions of Americans have been misled by the former president, they have heard only his words, but not the truth. As he continues to undermine our democratic process, sowing seeds of doubt about whether democracy really works at all...

"I am a conservative Republican, and the most conservative of conservative principles is reverence for the rule of law.

"The Electoral College has voted.
More than 60 state and federal courts,
including multiple judges the former president appointed,
have rejected his claims.

The Trump Department of Justice investigated
the former president's claims of widespread fraud and
found no evidence to support them.

The election is over.

That is the rule of law. That is our constitutional process.
Those who refuse to accept the rulings of our courts are at war with the Constitution.
Our duty is clear. Every one of us who has sworn the oath must act to prevent the unraveling of our democracy.

"This is not about policy. This is not about partisanship. This is about our duty as Americans.
Remaining silent and ignoring the lie emboldens the liar.
I will not participate in that. I will not sit back and watch in silence, while others lead our party down a path that abandons the rule of law and joins the former president's crusade to undermine our democracy."

~Liz Cheney, in a speech on May 11 that helps mark the downfall of the modern GOP and much of modern conservatism and modern white conservative evangelicalism.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/11/liz-cheney-house-floor-slams-trump-calls-him-threat-america/5047782001/

I'm glad that Cheney, W Bush, Romney and other responsible and decent conservatives have been speaking out or have started speaking out. I would hope that they could also recognize the part that they played in leading the US to this crisis time where a pervert conman could overtake the GOP that they helped shape... and maybe they do. But stepping up to clearly denounce a great existential threat to a free Republic is a starting point.

Oh, what has become of modern conservatism... Where facts, truth, decency, honesty, integrity used to matter? I truly believe that to be true, because I was raised amongst conservatives who held to those ideals.

And while I recognize that there are sort of three camps of conservatives -
those who've sold their souls to Trump-style corruption and dishonesty,
those who recognize Trump as a deviant but remain silent to appease their fellow conservatives and
those few who have publicly spoken up to denounce this for the deviant and dangerous corruption it is -
the latter seem to be a pretty small group and the Silent group is enabling the Deviant groups to maintain power.

Maybe, when people like Cheney and George W Bush speak out, the silent ones will find their spines and sense of decency and join those who are breaking away from the deviants. Time will tell and history will judge.


Sunday, May 9, 2021

Solutions to Problems that Don't Exist...


The experts are agreed: There is no data that shows we have a widespread voter fraud problem in our nation. That is, there is no evidence that bad actors are cheating the system in one way or another to change election outcomes via election fraud.

Conservative experts agree (here, from the Hoover Institute)...

https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evidence-voter-fraud-guide-statistical-claims-about-2020-election

The ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation notes... "The Heritage Foundation’s database includes 1,296 “proven instances of voter fraud” out of the hundreds of millions of votes cast going back to 1992. Of those cases identified, 1,120 resulted in criminal convictions."

[In fact, 1200 cases of fraud out of hundreds of millions of votes is an INFINITESIMAL amount of voter fraud. And, to be clear, HF described this, rather breathlessly as "Database SWELLS to 1,285 cases of Voter Fraud!!!" (emphases mine)... as if ~1300 cases out of millions is evidence of a problem, instead of evidence of NO significant problem. ~DT]

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

GOP voting experts agreed that there was no significant voter fraud happening leading up to the 2020 election...

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/republican-experts-are-in-agreement-the-2020-election-is-not-rigged-212332034.html

Experts agree...

"Despite this dramatic increase in mail voting over time, fraud rates remain infinitesimally small."

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/false-narrative-vote-mail-fraud

US Election officials agree...

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54926084

Over and over and over again, from GOP to Democrat, from election watchers to election experts... the people who know and who are responsible for free elections all agree that we have NO SIGNIFICANT ELECTION FRAUD happening in this nation.

Experts agree!

"That shouldn’t be a surprise. One exhaustive study of 12 years of elections in five states found only 500 cases of alleged voter fraud.

In 2016, North Carolina’s Board of Elections found that 4,769,640 votes were cast in November and that one would probably have been avoided with a voter ID law."

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article247291039.html

Trump's OWN LAWYERS didn't try to make that case in this last election, because they knew it was a stupidly false claim to make and they can get in trouble for that sort of foolishness.

"
Trump Cries Voter Fraud. In Court, His Lawyers Don’t."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont-11605271267

The facts are not in debate by rational people who know what they're speaking about. We don't have election fraud problems of any significance in our nation. It happens, the experts are not saying that it doesn't happen. We know it happens because pretty regularly, Republicans get caught doing it.

"
North Carolina Republican operative charged in election fraud scheme"

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-north-carolina/north-carolina-republican-operative-charged-in-election-fraud-scheme-idUSKCN1QG2FS

The experts are just noting that it's not a significant problem at all and doesn't impact elections.

Over and over again, I can cite the experts from across the political spectrum saying that there is no problem. Handfuls of voter fraud in hundreds of thousands of votes. Or 500 cases of voter fraud in millions of votes across many years.

Those are the facts, Trump and his useful idiots be damned.

So, after this last election, instead of agreeing with reality, some large number of GOP voters (70%!!) are denying reality and GOP politicians - many of them - are creating laws to restrict voting. IN SPITE of the reality that we have no serious election fraud problems. When they do this immediately following a loss due to high minority and young folk turn-out, people take note. We can SEE it's not because we have an election security problem. We can SEE that they're clearly doing this to try to maintain power in a nation where they are a decided minority and their candidates just can't win if they have a large population of brown/black/gay/young citizens to convince.

But what about the case for increasing election security, even though there is no significant election fraud?

First off, we have to admit that we're trying to find a solution for a problem that practically doesn't exist. But what IF we could more effectively prevent those handful of Republicans from cheating, by using Voter ID laws, for instance?

The problem in implementing "solutions" for non-existent problems is the consequences. If I were more naive, I might call them unintended consequences, but when the experts note that the restrictions put in place will tend (possibly) to damper more Democrat voters rather than Republican voters... at a time when the GOP voting base is dwindling... well, I'm not naive.

We could, for instance, be even more secure in our election process by demanding that each voter have an ID - better yet, three IDs! - and bring their parents along to confirm they are who they are? AND their pastor or rabbi or imam!? After all, having a photo ID AND parental confirmation AND religious leader confirmation would certainly dry up almost ALL cases of voter fraud of that sort.

But - and there's the vital part - it would certainly decrease the voter turnout and just wouldn't be necessary, given that this is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist!

That is, creating rules and restrictions that serve to decrease voter turn-out (especially of one party's voters... especially making it more difficult for the poor and marginalized) when there's not a problem that needs to be fixed, it's just wrong. It's creating more problems than the one they are trying to fix.

If the GOP wants to increase their chances of winning elections, let them do it by renouncing racist, misogynist, anti-LGBTQ, anti-environmental policies and win over their citizens by creating policies that more people will support... Or making a better case (if they can) for the policies they do support. In other words, let them do it by being candidates that appeal to more people.

But you don't do it by "fixing" problems that don't exist and especially not by lying and saying that there IS a significant voter fraud problem to (try to) scare people into supporting these unnecessary policies.

Wednesday, April 28, 2021

Morality and Harm


Stan (at his "Winging It" blog), recently took it upon himself to speak for me, telling me what I believe and identifying some area of agreement between us. The conservatives that I've interacted have historically proven incredibly inept at stating MY positions. Stan did better than many have done, but still missed the important distinctions of what I believe.

Stan said, among other things...

There is something that he and I agree on. Seriously. Dan argues that morality is based on harm. Without quite agreeing with that, I believe that harm is a principle that is involved with morality. Unfortunately, at that single point of agreement ... we diverge. Dan believes, next, that we can reliably figure out what "harm" is so we can reliably determine what should or should not be moral. I don't...

Dan and I both believe that morality and harm are interlinked.

The difference is that Dan is absolutely certain that he has the ability and wisdom and far-reaching understanding to determine what constitutes harm, and I'm just not that good. So I tend to rely on the Manufacturer, the Maker of humans. If He says, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? ..." (1 Cor 6:9-10) (for instance), I'm not going to castigate Him for saying so. I'm going to warn those I love. "Watch out! This will hurt you!"

His post is called "The Harm Principle," if anyone wants to read it in full.

Some clarifications/corrections...

1. Dan doesn't argue that morality is "based on harm."

2. Dan argues that IF we're causing harm to an innocent person, then we're almost certainly wrong to do so. That is, it's morally bad to harm another baselessly. It's wrong to kill someone. It's wrong to abuse, rape, burn to death, torture, blow up, steal from, assault another human being. That may be similar to "morality is based on harm," but I just wanted to clarify because it's not the same, to me.

The way I would put it might be something more like...

Morality can probably be best understood as supporting that which strengthens, encourages and helps, and immorality can probably be best understood as that which causes harm, oppression, a devaluation of human rights.

3. Where Stan suggests that I'm doing something amazing ("Dan believes we can reliably figure out what harm is...") I disagree. Where Stan says he's not reliably able to figure out what harm is ("I don't..." and "I'm just not that good..."), he is of course, mistaken. OF COURSE he can recognize that killing his neighbor is wrong. That abusing his child is wrong. That catching a person's house on fire is wrong.

That is, generally speaking, we all universally understand the reasonable and moral nature of Do No Harm to Others and the corresponding, Be Helpful, Be Kind, Be a Good Neighbor. In broad strokes, we tend to understand that, regardless of culture, religion, beliefs or politics.

4. Stan's "solution," on the other hand, "Use the Owners Manual," has its own set of problems.

4a. Not everyone agrees that the Bible is the owners manual, or even a good source for morality.

4b. Even amongst those who value the Bible's moral teachings, there is not universal agreement on what is and isn't moral.

4c. Referring to the "owners manual," then, to understand what is and isn't moral STILL involves our human reasoning and our human reasoning is imperfect.

Thus, the advantages of using Harm as a gauge of morality is that it's practical, it's understandable, it's understandable pretty universally, it's not dependent upon belief in a certain segment of sects within a given religion and its sacred text. It's a more universal way of understanding right and wrong.

And if, as Stan seems to acknowledge, that God wants the good for us and doesn't want bad, then we could also reason that IF we find a moral ruling that causes harm ("Polluting is okay, as long as it's only in rural water streams where not as many people live," for instance), then we can be pretty sure that it's violating "the owners manual..."

Put yet another way: IF an inability to understand morality 100% perfectly is a problem with using Harm as a guide, it's every bit as true that understanding morality based upon reading the Bible will also not result in 100% understanding.

Stan would not take the time to correct or address his misrepresentations and lack of understanding of my views on his blog, but I would ask him, Where am I mistaken?

Reading the Bible will not result in 100% perfect understanding of morality. Correct?

Using harm as a guide will not result in 100% perfect understanding of morality. Correct?

There is no data to suggest that using the Bible as a guide is ANY more effective at understanding morality than using harm as a guide. Indeed, given that some significant portion of the world does not take the Bible as a moral guide AND that even with those who do value the Bible, there is disagreement on moral questions, then one could argue that it's a less effective way to understand morality. 

Is that not reasonable? Practical?

Tuesday, April 20, 2021

We Shall Overcome... Someday?

From Dr King...


"You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?"

You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed,
this is the very purpose of direct action.


Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word "tension."

I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth.

Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood.

The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation
so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.


I therefore concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue...

We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was “well timed” in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation.

For years now I have heard the word “Wait!” It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This “Wait” has almost always meant “Never.” We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that “justice too long delayed is justice denied...”

Let us consider a more concrete example of just and unjust laws. An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal.

By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal.

Let me give another explanation.

A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama [Georgia, Dan] which set up that state's segregation laws was democratically elected? Throughout Alabama
[Georgia, Dan] all sorts of devious methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties in which, even though Negroes constitute a majority of the population, not a single Negro is registered. Can any law enacted under such circumstances be considered democratically structured?"

Read King's Letter from a Birmingham Jail...

https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html

Friday, April 16, 2021

Into the Swamp




Hiding in the hills, and taking to the trees
Wayward wandering ones

Led by smoke and led by fire
led by the noon day sun

Into the swamp we waded and tromped
baptized our bleeding scars
we flew from the noise to the peaceful fields
and there we gathered stars


 

Friday, April 9, 2021

That's "Good News..." How?


I'm still reading/listening to white conservative evangelicals talk about the Gospel, the literal Good News and trying to make sense of what they're saying. Rarely to never do I get answers, so just posting an attempt again at understanding.

So (I'm asking)... the GOOD news is that

1. your god is an impatient, irrational and unjust tyrant (Not that they're saying that, but if he were a king who acted this way, he'd be considered an impatient and unjust and irrational tyrant, as we'll see),
 
2. who created an imperfect humanity,

3. KNOWING that we were imperfect

4. and who then demands perfection to be in his company, to enter heaven

5. and when we are not perfect (ie, how your god created us, in your theory), that god thinks we deserve an eternity of torture and is willing to send us there

6. UNLESS we repent (and do it in just the right way, not being mistaken on how to do it, even though we're imperfect and prone to being mistaken - see point 2)

7. and THIS god (who would not be called loving or perfect if he were a human parent or ruler) has provided ONE possible bit of good news - that there MUST be a blood sacrifice to "pay" for our sin-debt... this god of yours is wholly impotent and incapable of forgiving sin outside of this perfect blood sacrifice and a repentance done in roughly just the right way

8. and thus, the "good news" is that IF you accept this blood sacrifice offered in our place (by this god's own son, no less!), you can be saved!

9. AND YET, if you are sincerely mistaken in your views about homosexuality or the penal substitutionary atonement or the inerrancy of the Bible and some other undesignated list of rules/tenets you must understand roughly correctly... all of that MIGHT be a sign that your "repentance" didn't quite "take" right or that you were never saved in the first place? That you repented wrongly?

Is that a fair rendering of what you're calling good news?

If so, do you realize that this version of "good news" goes entirely* un-preached by Jesus during his years on earth in any of the sermons he preached? That seems odd, doesn't it?

[*certainly not directly]

Also, there will be some VAST majority who will not understand this good news - or maybe never hear it! - or who will get the details wrong in a sufficient manner that any repentance they do (in good faith), won't be sufficient to save them, nor will your god's "grace," which is less grace and more of a cosmic blood payment business deal, is that right?

And that for that VAST majority of humanity, this god of yours will let them suffer unimaginably an eternity for some temporal "sins" or "crimes" they committed - most of those sins almost certainly of the relatively minor sort that wouldn't even merit a prison sentence with human justice. Certainly not a life imprisonment penalty, never mind an eternity of torture.

Do you understand how that doesn't seem to be good news at all, to many?

Saturday, April 3, 2021

An Easter Plot


[DAN: Jesus begins his ministry by saying...]

“The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because God has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
God has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and
recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.


[DAN: Some have noted that “the year of the Lord's favor” is a reference to the Jewish tradition of Jubilee and the Sabbath laws... rules designed to return land to the poor and to ensure that the poor and marginalized had real options to recover.

Soon after Jesus begins his ministry, the Pharisees and the teachers of the law begin responding to Jesus' ministry...]


The Pharisees and the teachers of the law who belonged to their sect complained to his disciples,


“Why do you eat and drink with tax collectors and sinners?”

Jesus answered them,

“It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.
I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”


Jesus and disciples were “harvesting” wheat from farmers' fields on the Sabbath...

The Pharisees asked,
“Why are you doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath?”

Jesus answered them,

“Have you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? He entered the house of God, and taking the consecrated bread, he ate what is lawful only for priests to eat. And he also gave some to his companions.

The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.”


On another Sabbath he went into the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was shriveled. The Pharisees and the teachers of the law were looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, so they watched him closely to see if he would heal on the Sabbath. But Jesus knew what they were thinking and said to the man with the shriveled hand...

“Get up and stand in front of everyone.”

So he got up and stood there.

Then Jesus said to them,

“I ask you, which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to destroy it?”

He looked around at them all, and then said to the man,

“Stretch out your hand.”

He did so, and his hand was completely restored.

But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.

Looking at his disciples, he said:

Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.
Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied.
Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh.
Blessed are you when people hate you, when they exclude you and insult you
and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.
“Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their ancestors treated the prophets.

But woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort.
Woe to you who are well fed now, for you will go hungry.
Woe to you who laugh now, for you will mourn and weep.
Woe to you when everyone speaks well of you,
for that is how their ancestors treated the false prophets.”

“But to you who are listening I say:

Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you,
bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.
If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also.
If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them.
Give to everyone who asks you, and
if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back.
Do to others as you would have them do to you.”


[DAN: John the Baptist was curious if Jesus was “the One...”]

At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. So he replied to John's messengers,

“Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard:
The blind receive sight,
the lame walk,
those who have leprosy are cleansed,
the deaf hear,
the dead are raised,
and the good news is proclaimed to the poor.
Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.”


[DAN: Jesus is speaking about the “proof” of his ministry and he talks about some miraculous events... but his BIG wrap up is, “the good news is proclaimed to the poor!”

Jesus, speaking of the Pharisees...]

“To what, then, can I compare the people of this generation? What are they like? They are like children sitting in the marketplace and calling out to each other:

“‘We played the pipe for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did not cry.’

“For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon.’ The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’ But wisdom is proved right by all her children.”

“Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will save it. What good is it for someone to gain the whole world, and yet lose or forfeit their very self?”

“Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.”


[DAN: Jesus, speaking of the Pharisees...]

“And you experts in the law,
woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.

Woe to you, because you build tombs for the prophets, and it was your ancestors who killed them. So you testify that you approve of what your ancestors did; they killed the prophets, and you build their tombs. Because of this, God in his wisdom said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and others they will persecute.’

Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, this generation will be held responsible for it all.

“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering.”


When Jesus went outside,
the Pharisees and the teachers of the law began to oppose him fiercely
and to besiege him with questions, waiting to catch him in something he might say.


[DAN: A rich man is planning on what to do with his great wealth...]

“Then he said, ‘This is what I’ll do. I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones, and there I will store my surplus grain. And I’ll say to myself, “You have plenty of grain laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry.”’

“But God said to him,
‘You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you.
Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?’

“This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God.”

Then Jesus said to his disciples:

“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat; or about your body, what you will wear. For life is more than food, and the body more than clothes. Consider the ravens: They do not sow or reap, they have no storeroom or barn; yet God feeds them. And how much more valuable you are than birds! Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to your life? Since you cannot do this very little thing, why do you worry about the rest?

“Consider how the wild flowers grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you, not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today, and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, how much more will he clothe you—you of little faith! And do not set your heart on what you will eat or drink; do not worry about it. For the pagan world runs after all such things, and your Father knows that you need them. But seek his kingdom, and these things will be given to you as well.

“Do not be afraid, little flock, for your Father has been pleased to give you the kingdom.
Sell your possessions and give to the poor. Provide purses for yourselves that will not wear out, a treasure in heaven that will never fail, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”

“When you give a luncheon or dinner, do not invite your friends, your brothers or sisters, your relatives, or your rich neighbors; if you do, they may invite you back and so you will be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.

You cannot serve both God and money.”


A certain ruler asked Jesus,

“Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”


“Why do you call me good? No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, honor your father and mother.’”

“All these I have kept since I was a boy,” he said.

When Jesus heard this, he said to him,

“You still lack one thing.
Sell everything you have and give to the poor,
and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”


When he heard this, he became very sad, because he was very wealthy. Jesus looked at him and said,

“How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!
Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than
for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”


Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them,

“I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”


“We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”

Jesus answered them,


“Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”’?

If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside -
what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’?

Do not believe me unless I do the works of my Father.

[DAN speaking: What WERE the works that Jesus was citing?
Preaching the good news of the realm of God specifically to the poor and marginalized...
and calling out the oppression of the rich and powerful and the religious rulers]


But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.”


[DAN: The parable of the sheep and the goats...]

“When the Holy One comes in glory, and all the angels with him, they will sit on their glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered before them, and they will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. They will put the sheep on the right and the goats on the left.

“Then the Ruler will say to those on the right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by God; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.
For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat,
I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink,
I was a stranger and you invited me in,
I needed clothes and you clothed me,
I was sick and you looked after me,
I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

“Then the righteous will answer, ‘Holy One, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

“The Ruler will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

“Then the Ruler will say to those on the left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

“The Ruler will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”


[DAN speaking: Nearing the end, now...

In the context of ALL that /\ consistent teaching,
the warnings against wealth and power,

the teachings to align with the poor, marginalized and “least of these,”
the
constant harsh rebukes and mocking of the religious leaders, the rich and powerful...
in THAT context and immediately after this parable about the sheep and the goats...

The Pharisees met...]

When Jesus had finished saying all these things, he said to his disciples,

“As you know, the Passover is two days away –
and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.”


Then
the chief priests and the elders of the people assembled in the palace of the high priest, whose name was Caiaphas, and
they schemed to arrest Jesus secretly and kill him.

“But not during the festival,” they said, “or there may be a riot among the people.”