Just to be clear: IF the verdict is Not Guilty, I will be disappointed, but I won't be in the streets protesting and calling it a sham. IF, on the other hand, he's found guilty, you can count on anger and protests from Trump and his allies.
5:06pm
Just to be clear: IF the verdict is Not Guilty, I will be disappointed, but I won't be in the streets protesting and calling it a sham. IF, on the other hand, he's found guilty, you can count on anger and protests from Trump and his allies.
5:06pm
In moderation, religious and spiritual practices can be great for a person’s life and mental well-being. But religious fundamentalism—which refers to the belief in the absolute authority of a religious text or leaders*—is almost never good for an individual. This is primarily because fundamentalism discourages any logical reasoning or scientific evidence that challenges its scripture, making it inherently maladaptive.
It is not accurate to call religious fundamentalism a disease,
because that term refers to a pathology that physically attacks the
biology of a system. But fundamentalist ideologies can be thought of as
mental parasites. A parasite does not usually kill the host it inhabits,
as it is critically dependent on it for survival. Instead, it feeds off
it and changes its behavior in ways that benefit its own existence.
By
understanding how fundamentalist ideologies function and are represented
in the brain using this analogy, we can begin to understand how to
inoculate against them, and potentially, how to rehabilitate someone who
has undergone ideological brainwashing—in other words, a reduction in
one’s ability to think critically or independently...
One particularly intriguing example of parasitic manipulation occurs when a hairworm infects a grasshopper and seizes its brain in order to survive and self-replicate. This parasite influences its behavior by inserting specific proteins into its brain. Essentially, infected grasshoppers become slaves for parasitic, self-copying machinery.
In much the same way, Christian fundamentalism is a parasitic ideology that inserts itself into brains, commanding individuals to act and think in a certain way—a rigid way that is intolerant to competing ideas. We know that religious fundamentalism is strongly correlated with what psychologists and neuroscientists call "magical thinking," which refers to making connections between actions and events when no such connections exist in reality. Without magical thinking, the religion can’t survive, nor can it replicate itself. Another cognitive impairment we see in those with extreme religious views is a greater reliance on intuitive rather than reflective or analytical thought, which frequently leads to incorrect assumptions since intuition is often deceiving or overly simplistic."https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201810/how-religious-fundamentalism-hijacks-the-brain
There's a lot there. Thanks, Stan!
* Note on fundamentalism: The word itself means "getting to the root of, the foundations of... getting to the bottom." That's not necessarily problematic, depending on what roots one is speaking of. But the word itself is a relatively new word coined to speak specifically of religious fundamentalism as we know it today, "to denote a strict and unquestioning set of beliefs linked to literal readings of sacred texts." or...
"Fundamentalist is said (by
George McCready Price) to have been first used in print by Curtis Lee
Laws (1868-1946), editor of "The Watchman Examiner," a Baptist
newspaper. The movement may have roots in the Presbyterian General
Assembly of 1910, which drew up a list of five defining qualities of
"true believers" which other evangelicals published in a
mass-circulation series of books called "The Fundamentals."
https://www.etymonline.com/word/fundamentalism
So, getting to the roots of Jesus' teachings, THAT is something I support and celebrate. But "a strict and unquestioning set of beliefs linked to literal/inerrant sacred texts..." that is problematic, from a rational point of view and, given the problems found in the Bible that Jesus had with the fundamentalist Pharisees, a biblical problem.
Seems to me.