Because of many conversations where
I've asked traditional evangelical conservative types, "WHERE is Penal
Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) in the teachings of Jesus?" ... and I've
asked because Jesus said clearly he'd come to preach good news to the
poor and marginalized and we have many of the teachings and sermons of
Jesus contained in the four Gospel books. IF Jesus was preaching PSA,
where is it? And when I've asked that, I've either gotten no answer or a
reference to maybe two verses where Jesus uses a phrase that COULD be
taken as a reference to PSA (if you squint and hope). So, I'm just doing
a pretty quick review of the entirety of the Gospel of Matthew IN
SEARCH OF PSA! Here we go!
Matt 1: we have the genealogy of Jesus (Matthew's genealogy)
Matt 2:
we find the story of the powerful Jewish king, Herod, who plots to kill
baby Jesus and acts monstrously in his position of wealth and power. We
also find that Jesus and his family become political refugees, seeking
asylum and safety from a mad king. Herod behaves as powerful despots
often do: he orders the mass slaughter of babies to defend his seat of
power.
“A voice is heard in Ramah,
weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children
and refusing to be comforted,
because they are no more.”
Matt 3:
We are introduced to John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin. John is already
getting in trouble for calling the Pharisees/Sadducees (the religious
leaders) "
You
brood of vipers!" and worse. Later on we find that John has a
heart for preaching good news to the poor and marginalized. In trying
to determine if Jesus was "The One," he asked if he was preaching to the
poor (Jesus was, of course). John is a wild, simple-living country
preacher who preached repentance, but the main target for his rebukes
was the Pharisees, the Sadducees and King Herod Antipas (the son of
Jesus' King Herod, the Baby Killer) Matt 4:
Jesus tempted in the desert. Jesus begins preaching, citing Isaiah "for
the people living in darkness have seen a great light..." Isaiah, to
the Jews of the time and today, would be known for calling the people to
not be consumed by wealth, but to follow God by defending the poor and
marginalized. The very "worship" that Israel did was condemned as
worthless, if not being an outgrowth of defending justice for the poor
and marginalized.
Jesus begins his preaching with a call to
repentance and welcome to the "kingdom of God," the realm of God, the
beloved community.
"Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues,
proclaiming the good news of the kingdom,
and healing every disease and sickness among the people."
This
"good news of the kingdom" is a consistent message/theme from Jesus and
Jesus expounds upon it repeatedly. In Luke we see that Jesus came to
preach this good news to the poor and marginalized. The realm of God is
Jesus' most mentioned theme.
Jesus calls his disciples from the normal working class people of the day. People who struggled to get by.
Matt 5-7: Sermon on the Mount. THE single most complete passage that we'd recognize as a sermon.
Not
once in this most complete sermon do we have a theme of substitutionary
atonement (a theory that some Christians developed over the
1200-1400s).
We do see simple, gracious living promoted, the Light of God in a dark world.
In
the context of John the Baptist's and eventually Jesus' ongoing rebukes
of the religious legalists, Jesus makes clear he's not come to take
away the laws, but to fulfill them, to help them be understood rightly.
We see gracious, humble ally-ship with the poor being taught (the people Jesus said he'd come to preach good news to)
We see simple living promoted and warnings of wealth.
We
see Jesus telling us clearly that we can recognize the followers of God
by the way they act (their "good fruit") which is made clear in many
places that this includes how we ally with and for "the least of these."
Matt 8-9: Jesus heals an "unclean" leper
Jesus heals the servant of a Roman centurion (the "enemy")
Jesus
heals many others (and a reminder that the physical and mentally ill in
that time would be considered unclean and marginalized and would
typically be poor and marginalized)
Jesus is rebuked by the religious for "daring" to forgive someone (again setting their legalism up and against Jesus' grace)
The
religious legalists continue to snipe at Jesus for hanging out with the
marginalized and unclean "sinners." (again, setting their legalism up
and against Jesus' grace)
Again and again, more healing and grace
and welcome from Jesus for the "sinners" and marginalized. More
sniping/attacks from the legalists. Making for a clear context between
the protagonist, God, and the way of Grace in opposition to the
antagonists, the Legalists, and the way of deadly and exclusionary
rule-following, rules that ultimately serve to further marginalize the
poor and marginalized (including the women, always).
The legalists begin literally demonizing Jesus, saying he was of the Devil. Sounds familiar, yes?
Matt 10: Jesus sends out his disciples to preach and share with the Jews (specifically), telling them:
As you go, proclaim this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’ Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy drive out demons. Freely you have received; freely give.
and giving some simple living instructions and instructions on grace. "Freely you have received, freely give..."
Jesus
warns them that the Legalists will attack and oppress them, but to go,
anyway. His instructions (other than the warnings about the legalists)
are always about welcome and grace and forgiveness.
Giving a cup of cold water to one of these...
A
third of the way through Matthew and no mention of PSA. Many mentions of
"the realm of God," service to/ally-ship with the poor and
marginalized, and simple, grace-full living, of welcoming.
Matt 11:
Jesus and John the Baptist stories. John confirms that Jesus is
preaching to the poor and healing, his "evidence" that Jesus was of God.
More preaching about the realm of God and the attacks against it
(clearly a reference to the Legalists):
From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been subjected to violence and violent people have been raiding it....
Jesus confronts the Legalists:
For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, ‘He has a demon.’ The
Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Here is a glutton
and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’ But wisdom is proved right by her deeds.”
The "THEY" who are saying these things aren't the regular "sinners," the poor and marginalized, the sexually active or others typically demonized. It's the Legalists.
Jesus
condemns some cities for their refusal to repent, but doesn't give
details. But he does compare them to Sodom and Gomorrah, which the Bible
says were condemned because they were arrogant and didn't care for the
poor and marginalized.
In contrast to the Legalists and the
burdens that weighed people down with, Jesus emphasizes the gentle,
welcoming grace and love of God's way:
Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”
Matt 12-13:
Jesus continues to be rebuked by and to rebuke the Legalists. They
condemn Jesus for "breaking the law" of the Sabbath rest, but Jesus
reminds them ("fulfills the law") that the Sabbath was made for humans,
not the other way around. God is not a legalist cop seeking to punish an
endless number of people for endless transgressions. God is a welcoming
Lover, seeking to give rest and support.
More confrontations of
the Legalists against Jesus and vice versa. Jesus again cites the
Prophet Isaiah and his welcoming beloved community where the poor are
not oppressed. MULTIPLE rebukes against the legalists.
Still no Substitutionary Atonement mentions.
Jesus'
teaches in parables (explaining that the Legalists will not understand
them, so long as they are legalists and not grace-followers/accepters.)
Matt 14-15:
Jesus feeds the large crowd of his followers, the poor and working
class who followed Jesus and listened to his teachings. Or rather, the
disciples feed them, as instructed by Jesus.
Jesus walks on water. Jesus heals the sick.
Jesus
confrontations with the Legalists increase and get more serious. Jesus
heals more people, including the gentile Canaanite woman (triply
unclean, being a woman and a gentile and an enemy of Israel!). Jesus
allows her to teach him about inclusion and grace.
Jesus again
cites the radical Isaiah, who condemned the legalists. Jesus feeds
another large crowd of the poor and marginalized and working class who
followed him.
Matt 16-20: More
conflicts and rebukes of the legalists, who have begun actively testing
him, looking for justification to have him killed. Jesus tells on
them/tells his disciples it won't be long. More healing.
Transfiguration.
Jesus teaches more about grace and humility and welcoming/becoming like a little child.
He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me.
Jesus speaks about the limitless nature of forgiveness and grace.
Jesus
speaks about divorce (don't do it). Jesus tells the rich young man that
for him to be saved, he'd need to give up his wealth. Jesus
clarifies/emphasizes: "Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."
More parables. Parables about money/wealth and workers, which concludes: "So the last will be first, and the first will be last"
THEN,
FINALLY, about 2/3 through the Gospel of Matthew, we find ONE line
where Jesus utters a phrase that COULD be taken to be referring to some
kind of atonement. But it was not part of one of the sermons Jesus
taught (again, Jesus came to preach good news to the poor and marginalized!), but in a private conversation where the POINT being discussed was humility within the realm of God.
When the ten heard about this, they were indignant with the two brothers [James/John]. Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave— just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
Now,
IF Jesus had repeatedly, in his sermons and teachings to the poor and
least of these had talked about the need for a blood payment to atone
(as the ONLY way God would be able/willing to forgive people), THEN this
one passage might be taken to speaking of that. But that doesn't
happen. Period. But absent that, this seems, on the face of it, to be
talking about why we should strive to be humble, not seek to be great.
For even God in Jesus came to serve and to pour out his life in service
to others. Absent any other mention of (let alone emphasis upon)
atonement, I don't see this being perforce understood that way.
Matt 21-22:
Jesus enters Jerusalem in the final escalation between the grace of the
protagonist, Jesus and the legalism of the antagonists, the Legalists.
Jesus arrives humbly upon a mule, not as a triumphant warrior king. The
working class and poor who followed Jesus celebrated his arrival.
Jesus
enters the temple and sees the moneychangers cheating
(especially/specifically the poor) inside the temple and drives/chases
them out with a handmade whip. More confrontation with the Legalists.
Jesus sides with the humble children (the least of these) over and
against the wishes of the powerful legalists.
More parables.
Legalists plot to arrest Jesus but fear the regular people, who were his
ardent followers. Some of the parables are speaking of the powerful who
will abuse the humble King. When the rich and powerful won't come to
the dinner, the King welcomes the poor and marginalized, in rebuke of
the rich and powerful.
More confrontations and plots from the legalists. Jesus teaches the simple, "greatest commandments" - Love God, Love people.
Matt 23-25: Jesus gives the Legalists a great deal of hell. Rebukes and condemnation for them and their legalism ways.
More
parables, including the Sheep and the Goats, in which Jesus makes clear
that HE is the least of these. "In as much as you do it to them, you do
it to me."
Matt 26-28: The Last Supper. Here, in this private conversation with the disciples, we have the
SECOND of only two potential mentions of Atonement. In sharing the supper (in his typical, humble, grace-full way), Jesus says:
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take and eat; this is my body.” Then he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
Once
again, IF in the sermons of "good news for the poor and marginalized"
Jesus had clearly mentioned something like atonement, THEN we might
could envision that this second sentence in a private conversation COULD
be referencing atonement as the modern religionists mean it. But we
just don't have that. Period.
From this point on, we have the
final kangaroo court of the Legalists who are enraged at Jesus' way of
grace and inclusion and failure to follow the rules that they thought
were important. Then Jesus Roman trial and capitol punishment
torture/execution by more people in power (although, in his defense, the
cowardly Roman governor, Pilate, at least had the sense to say "I don't
see he's done anything wrong..." and yet, he still had him executed) .
In
summation, we don't have ONE single sermon where ANYTHING like the
Penal Substitutionary Atonement theory (theorized by humans hundreds of
years after Jesus' death and resurrection) in the canon of Jesus'
teachings to the poor and marginalized as found in Matthew.
IF
we assume that Jesus (who, once again, literally said he'd come to
preach good news to the poor and marginalized) would have, at some point
in at least ONE set of his teachings, seen fit to at least give a
passing mention to something like atonement as theorized by some, it
would be there in his words in his sermons/teachings. It's literally
not.
What we do see is a gospel (good news to the poor and
marginalized, remember) full of words of welcome, grace, forgiveness,
acceptance and love to all, beginning with the poor and marginalized AND
we see a gospel full of warnings and rebukes to the legalists, the rich
and powerful. The legalists, the rich and powerful are literally the
antagonists in the Gospels of Jesus - the warning to NOT be like THAT.
And
while the "regular people," the poor, marginalized and working class
are called to repentance and to join the Realm of God, the Beloved
Community of Grace, they are never rebuked exceedingly harshly. The
warnings of hell and condemnation are nearly exclusively (exclusively?)
for the rich, powerful legalists.
fyi.