This is not quite right or finished yet, I don't think, but I wanted to put down these thoughts while I'm thinking about them...
"Love the
'sinner'
hate the
'sin'"
is a problematic suggestion
Rationally, morally and from a simple place of common grace
it's presumptuous and condescending
and I'd suggest, just not helpful or
loving
(thereby making mockery of the first premise
as if one could love the poor pathetic "sinner" that one looks down upon)
Rather:
Love the sinner
"Love the
'sinner'
hate the
'sin'"
is a problematic suggestion
Rationally, morally and from a simple place of common grace
it's presumptuous and condescending
and I'd suggest, just not helpful or
loving
(thereby making mockery of the first premise
as if one could love the poor pathetic "sinner" that one looks down upon)
Rather:
Love the sinner
Hate the conflating of all human failures with intentional evil
Love the sinner
Hate the oppression - sure
and not only hate the oppression
and not only hate the oppression
but take an active stand against the oppressors
But
"Love the 'sinner...'"?
How about this:
Love the human
"Love the 'sinner...'"?
How about this:
Love the human
even in our imperfection
because, why not?
Maybe, love the human who is imperfect
(ie, all of us)
as God loves all of us
just because
Just because we are family,
we are one,
we are the Beloved of God
and who are we to dispute a Loving God?
Yes, yes,
we must hate the oppression and those who abuse
we must take actions to
ally with and protect those who are being abused and oppressed
but most of us in our daily lives?
we're not choosing to abuse
to harm
to oppress
We're just being imperfect humans and
while that can be awful enough
it's not like it rises to the level of Evil
It's sufficient to keep in mind that this term
SIN
which has been so badly abused through the centuries
sinfully so, indeed,
in the original texts and languages simply meant
missing the mark
trying one's best but not quite hitting the target
That is,
simply imperfect
not evil.
The more I ponder conservative human theories about "sin natures"
the more I'm convinced of the harm of those theories
at least in how they're implemented.
because, why not?
Maybe, love the human who is imperfect
(ie, all of us)
as God loves all of us
just because
Just because we are family,
we are one,
we are the Beloved of God
and who are we to dispute a Loving God?
Yes, yes,
we must hate the oppression and those who abuse
we must take actions to
ally with and protect those who are being abused and oppressed
but most of us in our daily lives?
we're not choosing to abuse
to harm
to oppress
We're just being imperfect humans and
while that can be awful enough
it's not like it rises to the level of Evil
It's sufficient to keep in mind that this term
SIN
which has been so badly abused through the centuries
sinfully so, indeed,
in the original texts and languages simply meant
missing the mark
trying one's best but not quite hitting the target
That is,
simply imperfect
not evil.
The more I ponder conservative human theories about "sin natures"
the more I'm convinced of the harm of those theories
at least in how they're implemented.


